Key Takeaways

• Massive Financial Reset: Over $20B in one-time charges and $10B+ cost reduction by 2025, marking fundamental pivot from technical catch-up to profitability focus
• AWS Deal: Multi-billion dollar commitment for custom Xeon and AI fabric chip validates Intel’s foundry strategy with premier cloud customer
• AI PC Strategy Impact: Lunar Lake’s high-volume success comes with significant gross margin pressure due to integrated memory design, though this is a one-time design choice
• Mixed AI Position: Strong in CPU-based AI workloads (70%+ share in head nodes) but struggling with Gaudi3 accelerator adoption, missing $500M target
• Manufacturing Insourcing: Bringing 70%+ of production back in-house with 18A/Panther Lake, critical for margin improvement in 2026+ but depends on successful execution

Intel delivered a quarter marked by strategic restructuring and operational progress. Revenue exceeded the midpoint of guidance, though profitability was impacted by significant restructuring charges as the company aggressively moves to lower costs and improve efficiency. The company made substantial headway on its cost reduction initiatives, targeting over $10 billion in savings by 2025, including completing the majority of planned headcount reductions aimed at a 15% workforce reduction.

On the strategic front, Intel announced several major organizational changes, including moving the Edge business into CCG and establishing Intel Foundry as an independent subsidiary. Capital expenditures were reduced by over 20% from initial 2024 plans, reflecting a more disciplined approach to investment. Product-wise, the company launched several key offerings including the Core Ultra 200 V Series (Lunar Lake) processors and Gaudi3 AI accelerator, though Gaudi adoption has been slower than anticipated. The company remains on track to ship 100M AI PCs by the end of 2025.

The quarter saw significant financial charges, including $3 billion in impairment charges mostly related to Intel 7, a $10 billion deferred tax asset impairment, $2.6 billion Mobileye goodwill impairment, and $2.2 billion in severance charges. These charges reflect the company’s aggressive restructuring efforts to position for future growth.

On Gross Margins: Why Not report Adjusted GMs?

Intel’s decision to report an 18% gross margin (including the $3.1B of 7nm manufacturing asset write-downs) rather than the adjusted 41% margin appears questionable from a standard reporting perspective, but may reflect a few strategic considerations:

• Conservative Accounting & Transparency:
  • By including the full $3.1B write-down impact, Intel is being maximally conservative and transparent about real manufacturing challenges and costs
  • This shows investors they are being upfront about technology transition difficulties rather than trying to mask them through adjustments
• Setting Future Expectations:
  • By taking the full hit now, Intel creates an easier comparison base for future quarters
  • The 18% reported margin sets a low baseline, making future improvements look more impressive
  • This ties to management’s comments about gross margin headwinds persisting into next year but improving in 2026
• Strategic Messaging:
  • The dramatic margin impact helps reinforce Intel’s broader narrative about the significant investments and costs required for their manufacturing transformation
  • It provides tangible evidence of their commitment to the foundry strategy despite near-term financial pain
  • May help in discussions with government entities regarding subsidies by highlighting the real costs involved
• However, the analysts appear somewhat skeptical of this approach, noting that excluding the write-down would have resulted in margins of approximately 41% vs guidance of 38%. This suggests Intel could have chosen to report adjusted figures to show better underlying business performance.

The key insight is that Intel seems to be prioritizing sending strategic messages about its manufacturing transformation over presenting optimized financial metrics, even if it means absorbing significant near-term hits to reported margins. This plays into their longer-term story about returning to process leadership, even at the cost of near-term results.

Analysis of Q&A Sentiment and Management Responses:

Investors focused heavily on several key areas: the progress of Intel 18A development, gross margin trajectory, AI strategy and competitiveness, foundry business development, and capital allocation. Management provided detailed technical responses about 18A development, showing confidence in the technology roadmap while being realistic about timeline and execution challenges.

The discussion of financial metrics was particularly noteworthy, with management providing clear explanations of gross margin pressures, especially related to Lunar Lake’s memory packaging impact. They were forthright about near-term challenges while emphasizing the path to improvement in 2026 and beyond.

On AI strategy, management articulated a measured view of Intel’s position, acknowledging areas where they need to improve (like Gaudi adoption) while emphasizing their strengths in CPU-based AI workloads and the growing importance of inference versus training. The foundry discussion revealed steady progress in securing new customers, though management was careful to set realistic expectations about the pace of revenue growth.

Overall, the Q&A reflected cautious optimism from investors balanced against ongoing execution concerns. Management’s responses suggested confidence in their technical roadmap while acknowledging the significant work still ahead. Their emphasis on cost discipline and portfolio rationalization appeared to resonate with analysts, though questions remain about the pace and magnitude of financial improvement. The tone was notably more focused on sustainable business model results and shareholder returns compared to previous quarters’ emphasis on technological catch-up.

Join the newsletter and stay up to date