In the latest episode of my TEQ podcast, I had the pleasure to engaged in an insightful conversation with Alexia Cambon, Head of Research on Microsoft’s Copilot and Future of Work team, about how artificial intelligence and AI agents are fundamentally reshaping the workplace. The discussion explored findings from Microsoft’s latest Work Trend Index report, which examines the emergence of what they call “frontier firms” – organizations at the forefront of integrating AI agents into their workflows.

The Birth of the Frontier Firm

According to Cambon, 2025 marks “the year the frontier firm was born” – not when all companies will become frontier firms, but when this new organizational model begins to take shape. She outlined three distinct phases in the journey toward becoming a frontier firm:

1. Personal Assistant Phase: Where most organizations currently stand – AI functions primarily as a productivity tool for individuals, helping them complete existing tasks more efficiently.

2. Digital Colleague Phase: As AI technology improves, agents begin to join teams as digital colleagues, collaborating with humans on key tasks.

3. Frontier Firm Phase: The final stage where agents operate autonomously with human oversight, handling entire workflows and processes end-to-end, creating a flexible intelligence resource that can scale up or down rapidly.

A striking advantage of AI agents compared to human resources is the speed of deployment. Unlike traditional hiring processes that might involve years of education and months of onboarding, AI agents can be deployed and integrated into workflows within hours.

 From Org Chart to Work Chart

Perhaps the most transformative concept discussed was the shift from organizing companies around traditional hierarchical structures (org charts) to organizing around the actual work that needs to be done (work charts).

Cambon explained that companies have historically been structured around bundles of expertise – legal departments for legal expertise, marketing departments for marketing expertise, and so on. This made sense when humans were the only source of specialized knowledge. However, in a world where expertise can also be accessed through AI, this siloed approach creates inefficiencies.

The research suggests a future where companies might restructure around jobs and tasks rather than human expertise, allowing for more fluid collaboration between humans and AI agents. This shift could eliminate artificial silos that often serve human comfort but don’t necessarily serve business goals.

The Speed of Business Outpacing Human Capacity

Microsoft’s telemetry data revealed some startling insights about the current business environment:

1. Workers are interrupted by notifications approximately every two minutes
2. PowerPoint editing increases by 122% in the ten minutes before a meeting compared to the three hours prior
3. The overall speed of business is outpacing existing workflows and human capacity

Rather than AI replacing jobs, the research suggests that organizations have more work than can be accomplished – even with AI’s productivity enhancements. This is where agents become crucial, providing additional capacity to handle the increasing workload.

The Work Trend Index identified a small subset of employees (844 out of 31,000 surveyed) who could reasonably be working for frontier firms based on criteria like organization-wide AI deployment and integration of agents into strategy. These employees reported significantly better outcomes:

• 70% said their companies were thriving (versus 37% globally)
• They were more likely to say they could take on more work
• They reported working on more meaningful and purposeful work
• The Human-Agent Ratio

As organizations incorporate more digital agents, Cambon introduced a new metric: the human-agent ratio. Similar to how managers have an optimal number of direct reports, organizations will need to determine the ideal ratio of humans to agents across different functions.

This ratio will likely vary significantly by department and task type. For example, HR might have a 1:2 or 1:3 ratio, while supply chain operations with many repetitive tasks might effectively operate at 1:300. Each organization will need to determine these thresholds based on their specific needs and desired level of human oversight.

The Agent Boss Mindset

One of the most intriguing concepts discussed was the “agent boss mindset” – the idea that all employees will soon need to develop skills to effectively manage and delegate work to AI agents.

Cambon observed that while traditionally, management experience might take years to attain, new employees will soon become “CEOs of their own little agentic startup” almost immediately. They’ll be expected to build and manage agents to help with their work from day one.

This could create a valuable training ground for developing management skills in a lower-risk environment, since agents don’t have the emotional needs or career aspirations of human colleagues. However, as Milanesi noted, employers will still need to foster emotional intelligence and empathy for when these employees do manage human colleagues.

Why We Turn to AI

Perhaps the most surprising finding was about why people choose to use AI rather than asking human colleagues for help. Contrary to expectations, the top reasons weren’t related to frustrations with human colleagues (like slow responses or fear of judgment), but rather centered on AI’s unique capabilities:

1. 24/7 availability (the ability to get assistance at any hour)
2. Machine speed and quality (processing large amounts of data quickly)
3. Ideas on tap (generating creative ideas instantly)

This suggests people are gravitating toward AI not as a replacement for human collaboration but as a complementary resource with different strengths.

Preparing for the Transition

As organizations navigate this transition, Cambon offered guidance for both companies and individuals:

For organizations:

– Consider creating dedicated teams focused on transformation (as Microsoft has done)

– Think strategically about how the organization should adapt rather than waiting to see how things unfold

For individuals:

– Recognize that while some jobs will change or disappear, new roles will be created

– Take control by experimenting with and upskilling in AI

– Provide your perspective on how AI could change your role and make you more valuable

Cambon shared an anecdote about a data scientist on her team who, rather than feeling threatened by AI tools that could help researchers analyze data independently, embraced the technology by building specialized agents for their team. He created agents that could scan research overnight, perform complex statistical analysis, and help design surveys—making himself even more valuable in the process.

Cambon and I both agree that the key to success lies in viewing AI not as a replacement for human work but as an additional intelligence resource with unique capabilities—one that can transform roles and enhance the value that human workers bring to their organizations.

Join the newsletter and stay up to date